RAIN IS NOT MY INDIAN NAME: Laura Ashley’s Prissy Twin

rain back coverA Chapter From RAIN IS NOT MY INDIAN NAME

Warning: this page gives away some events and language from the novel.

Memory Ticklers

  • What kind of a bridge does Aunt Georgia want the Indian Campers to build?
  • Does Dad approve of Rain’s decision to cover Indian Camp for the paper?
  • What does Rain discover in her hope chest that makes her determined to work things out with Natalie?
  • What is Fynn’s political affiliation?
  • How far along is Natalie’s pregnancy?

For Book Talks Or For Your Journal


Aunt Georgia tells The Flash that “mostly, I just think these kids need one another.” Rain mentions that Aunt Georgia doesn’t elaborate.

What do you think Aunt Georgia meant by that?

Later, Aunt Georgia says it’s not her place to tell The Flash any more about the rice harvest. Why is this the case?


Dad is pleased that Rain is covering, rather than participating in Indian Camp. He tells her, “A person shouldn’t let her heritage hold her back.”

Are there any other hints in the novel that Dad has distanced himself from his own Native heritage or sees it as sometimes a negative?

Why do you think he might feel this way?

Are there historical and contemporary forces that make some Native people struggle with their self-image? If so, what are they?

Why might Dad be particularly vulnerable to them?

How does his attitude affect Rain and Fynn?

Do you think the impact is greater or lesser because Mama is no longer alive? Why?


Rain is shocked to see Natalie return from tea with her mother looking like “Laura Ashley’s prissy twin.”

What does this transformation say about Natalie at this point in the story?

Was there a transformation for another character earlier in the book? If so, how are these linked?

Author Insights

Mainstream U.S. (and to a lesser extent European) novelists tend to write children’s and young adult novels in a very linear way “as if an arrow were shooting through the manuscript.” They tend to be about the triumph of individuals. Depicted families tend to be smaller. Community is not reflected in most stories.

In contrast, Native novelists tend to be less linear, more circular (though this can be overstated), and offer more stories of extended families and communities. Why? I think it’s simply a cultural perspective issue.

In especially the U.S., society is in large part based on individual rights and responsibilities. In contrast, Native cultures tend to favor community rights and responsibilities. The two novel styles are an extension of the cultural value systems that inspire them.